Browse By Unit
1 min readβ’june 18, 2024
Welcome to AP Calc 10.10! In this lesson, youβll learn how to estimate the accuracy of a partial sum for an alternating series.
The error bound theorem for an alternating series states that for a convergent alternating series, , we can estimate its true value by using an error bound. The error bound is defined as . We can estimate the true value of the sum () with the following equation: where is the first omitted term of our estimation.
Thatβs a lot of informationβnow letβs break it down with an example!
The first thing we need is a convergent, alternating series. Letβs use this one:
Weβre going to find the error bound for an estimation made with the first 3 terms. That means our bound is defined as . Notice that we need to find up to the fourth term to find the error bound. This is because four is our first omitted term. For now, letβs calculate this fourth term.
This is our error bound. That means that when we estimate the sum of the infinite series using the third term, our error wonβt be greater than in either direction. Letβs finish this example by using the sum of the first three terms and the error bound to estimate what our infinite series is equal to.
We can now say that the error bound is:
We can simplify this like so:
This means that the true value of the infinite sum lies somewhere between about β0.203125 and β0.078125. You can also tell that this estimation isnβt very accurate, since the two bounds donβt share any digits. You can make more accurate estimations by calculating more terms.
Now itβs your turn to apply what youβve learned!
Find the error bound of for the following infinite series and state which is a more accurate estimation.
For each problem, first find , the value of the first omitted term:
Then, find the value of the series up to five terms (review Riemann sums for help calculating summation!).
Next, set up your inequalities.
Finally, simplify!
Now that we have both our answers, we can compare their accuracy. For the first problem, we see that the answers donβt share any decimal pointsβmeaning itβs not very accurate. However, the second problem is accurate to two decimal places. Therefore, the second estimation is more accurate.
As complicated as this might feel, this skill relies on techniques youβve been learning for a long time! Make sure you keep practicing and youβre sure to ace any questions on this topic π―
<< Hide Menu
1 min readβ’june 18, 2024
Welcome to AP Calc 10.10! In this lesson, youβll learn how to estimate the accuracy of a partial sum for an alternating series.
The error bound theorem for an alternating series states that for a convergent alternating series, , we can estimate its true value by using an error bound. The error bound is defined as . We can estimate the true value of the sum () with the following equation: where is the first omitted term of our estimation.
Thatβs a lot of informationβnow letβs break it down with an example!
The first thing we need is a convergent, alternating series. Letβs use this one:
Weβre going to find the error bound for an estimation made with the first 3 terms. That means our bound is defined as . Notice that we need to find up to the fourth term to find the error bound. This is because four is our first omitted term. For now, letβs calculate this fourth term.
This is our error bound. That means that when we estimate the sum of the infinite series using the third term, our error wonβt be greater than in either direction. Letβs finish this example by using the sum of the first three terms and the error bound to estimate what our infinite series is equal to.
We can now say that the error bound is:
We can simplify this like so:
This means that the true value of the infinite sum lies somewhere between about β0.203125 and β0.078125. You can also tell that this estimation isnβt very accurate, since the two bounds donβt share any digits. You can make more accurate estimations by calculating more terms.
Now itβs your turn to apply what youβve learned!
Find the error bound of for the following infinite series and state which is a more accurate estimation.
For each problem, first find , the value of the first omitted term:
Then, find the value of the series up to five terms (review Riemann sums for help calculating summation!).
Next, set up your inequalities.
Finally, simplify!
Now that we have both our answers, we can compare their accuracy. For the first problem, we see that the answers donβt share any decimal pointsβmeaning itβs not very accurate. However, the second problem is accurate to two decimal places. Therefore, the second estimation is more accurate.
As complicated as this might feel, this skill relies on techniques youβve been learning for a long time! Make sure you keep practicing and youβre sure to ace any questions on this topic π―
Β© 2025 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.